Agreements and Negotiations

Award and agreement negotiation of sponsored research projects at Marquette are generally handled by the Office Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP). ORSP review awards and agreements from a wide range of sponsors, including industry sponsors, non-profit organizations, state governments, the federal government, and foreign entities. ORSP works closely with the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) and the Office of Economic Engagement to promote and facilitate the extramurally supported research, education and outreach missions of the University through  review and negotiation of the terms and conditions of agreements.

In reviewing award agreements, our office works to ensure that the terms and conditions of the award documentation align with federal and state laws, Marquette University policies, ORSP Policies, and the needs of the researchers here on campus.

Once a federal award is made to Marquette, an appropriate risk level for all named subrecipients needs to be determined. This is done through review of a completed Subrecipient Commitment Form and of a subrecipient's audit information. The purpose of these reviews is to determine whether the subrecipient has the appropriate policies and procedures in place to manage federal funds, and, if concerns are noted, determine additional monitoring terms and conditions. Subrecipient must also provide Marquette a statement of work, budget, and other necessary documentation.

Once the subaward agreement has been issued, the Contract Administrator will respond to any requests for changes to the subaward, ensuring that any agreed-upon changes are still in compliance with federal regulations and university policies.

Once the subaward is fully executed, the PI is responsible for regular monitoring of the subaward throughout the life of the award. The purpose of monitoring is to ensure federal funds are spent in compliance with the applicable laws, regulations and provisions, and ensure performance goals are met. The Contract Administration team will perform annual audit reviews and alert upper administration if relevant audit findings arise.

 

Agreement Types

A Material Transfer Agreement (MTA) is a contract that governs the transfer of tangible research materials between two organizations, when the recipient intends to use it for his or her own research purposes or commercial evaluation. The MTA defines the rights of the provider and the recipient with respect to the materials and any derivatives. Biological materials are the most frequently transferred materials, but MTAs may also be used for other types of materials, such as chemical compounds and even some types of software. As a general rule, MTAs are required for any incoming or outgoing materials in order to monitor what materials are coming on campus, and what materials (and to whom) Marquette is supplying.

Whether the material is incoming or outgoing, Marquette uses a standard MTA which is negotiated by the ORSP Contract Administrator


Incoming Material Transfer Agreement

Outgoing Material Transfer Agreement

Compliance Review

 

Consulting Agreement

Educational Research Agreement (ERA)

Federal Demonstration Partnership Agreement (FDP) 

Participation Agreement

Speaker Agreement

 

Principal Investigators (PI) and other researchers may be asked to accept/provide confidential or restricted information, materials, software code, or technology from/to a sponsor or third party. In these situations, a Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA) is needed. The NDA is designed to cover the exchange of verbal, visual or written information, including documents, slides, charts, models and other displays.

Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA)