New Marquette Law School Poll survey of Wisconsin finds close races in Senate and governor primaries and in November final elections, with enthusiasm for voting gap favoring Republicans

June 22, 2022


Please note: Complete Poll results and methodology information can be found online at law.marquette.edu/poll

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll survey of Wisconsin finds close races shaping up in both Republican and Democratic gubernatorial and U.S. Senate primaries in August, as well as in the November U.S. Senate race. The poll also finds that incumbent Gov. Tony Evers has an early advantage in the general election for governor.

In the first Marquette Law School Poll conducted since he entered the race in April, Tim Michels is the choice of 27% of Republicans (including independents who lean Republican) and independents who say they will vote in the GOP primary for governor. Rebecca Kleefisch is supported by 26%, Kevin Nicholson is supported by 10%, Tim Ramthun is the choice of 3%, and Adam Fischer is supported by less than 0.5%. A substantial 32% of Republican primary voters remain undecided, down from 46% who were undecided in the Marquette Law School Poll conducted in April.

In the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate, Mandela Barnes receives support of 25% and Alex Lasry is supported by 21% among Democrats (including independents who lean Democratic) and independents who say they will vote in the Democratic primary. Sarah Godlewski is the choice of 9%, and Tom Nelson holds 7%. The other seven candidates received 1% or less support.

Many Democratic primary voters remain undecided, with 36% saying they don’t know how they will vote, which is less than the 48% who were undecided in the April survey.

The survey was conducted June 14-20, 2022, interviewing 803 Wisconsin registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.3 percentage points. The margin of error for Democratic primary voters is 6.2 percentage points and for Republican primary voters is 6.3 percentage points.

Table 1 shows the trends in support for the Republican primary for governor since February. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages; the precise wording of the questions can be found in the online link noted at the top.)

Table 1: Republican primary preferences, U.S. Senate, February-June 2022

Primary choice

June

April

February

Michels

27

NA

NA

Kleefisch

26

32

30

Nicholson

10

10

8

Ramthun

3

4

5

Other

2

3

1

Fischer

*

NA

NA

Will not vote

0

3

1

Don’t know

32

46

54

Refused

0

1

2

* indicates less than .5% but more than 0

Table 2 shows the trends in support for the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate since February.

Table 2: Democratic primary preferences, U.S. Senate, February-June 2022

Primary choice

June

April

February

Barnes

25

19

23

Lasry

21

16

13

Godlewski

9

7

3

Nelson

7

5

5

Peckarsky

1

1

0

Olikara

*

0

0

Lewis

*

1

2

Murphy

*

*

2

Lee

0

0

0

Rumbaugh

0

0

0

Williams

0

*

*

Battino

NA

NA

1

Will not vote

0

3

3

Don’t know

36

48

48

Refused

0

1

1

* indicates less than .5% but more than 0

General election for governor

For the first time in the 2022 election cycle, this poll asked about possible November general election pairings for governor, matching incumbent Gov. Tony Evers against each of the top four Republican primary candidates. These results are shown in Table 3 (a) through Table 3 (d). Evers is supported by 47% to Kleefisch’s 43%, and Evers gets 48% to Michels’ 41%. Against Nicholson, Evers receives 48% to 40%. Evers holds a 51% to 34% margin over Ramthun. Here, and in subsequent tables, candidates are listed in alphabetical order.

Table 3: November general election for governor

(a) Evers vs. Kleefisch

Poll dates

Evers

Kleefisch

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

47

43

1

2

7

1

(b) Evers vs. Michels

Poll dates

Evers

Michels

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

48

41

2

1

8

1

(c) Evers vs. Nicholson

Poll dates

Evers

Nicholson

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

48

40

1

1

8

1

(d) Evers vs. Ramthun

Poll dates

Evers

Ramthun

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

51

34

2

1

11

1

General election for U.S. Senate

The November race for U.S. Senate will match incumbent Republican Sen. Ron Johnson against the winner of the August Democratic primary. This poll paired each of the top four primary candidates against Johnson. This is the first such matchup in the Marquette Law School Poll this cycle. These results are shown in Table 4 (a) through Table 4 (b). Johnson slightly trails three of the four Democrat candidates polled, including 46%-44% against Barnes, 45%-43% against Godlewski, and 44%-43% against Nelson. Previewing a possible matchup with Lasry, Johnson slightly leads in support, 45%-42%.

Table 4: November general election for U.S. Senate

(a) Johnson vs. Barnes

Poll dates

Johnson

Barnes

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

44

46

1

1

7

1

(b) Johnson vs. Godlewski

Poll dates

Johnson

Godlewski

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

43

45

2

1

9

1

(c) Johnson vs. Lasry

Poll dates

Johnson

Lasry

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

45

42

2

1

10

1

(d) Johnson vs. Nelson

Poll dates

Johnson

Nelson

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Refused

6/14-20/22

43

44

2

1

10

1

Favorability of the primary candidates

Table 5 shows the favorability ratings of the top four Republican candidates for governor and the percentage with no opinion (i.e., those saying they haven’t heard enough or don’t know how they feel about the candidate). Michels and Kleefisch have essentially equally positive net favorable ratings from GOP primary voters, with Nicholson about half as net favorable. Ramthun has a net negative favorability rating. Among these candidates, 46% or more of Republican voters say they don’t have an opinion of each, less than two months before the primary on Aug. 9.

Table 5: Favorability of Republican primary candidates, among Republican primary voters

Candidate

Net

Favorable opinion

Unfavorable

No opinion

Kleefisch

34

44

10

46

Michels

35

42

7

51

Nicholson

19

27

8

65

Ramthun

-3

7

10

84

Favorability of the Democratic primary candidates for governor among Democratic primary voters is shown in Table 6. Barnes has the highest net favorability, followed by Lasry, Godlewski, and Nelson. In each instance, over 50% of Democratic primary voters say they don’t have an opinion of the candidates

Table 6: Favorability to Democratic primary candidates, among Democratic primary voters

Candidate

Net

Favorable

Unfavorable

No opinion

Barnes

38

41

3

56

Godlewski

17

24

7

69

Lasry

22

31

9

60

Nelson

4

12

8

79

Partisanship and vote choice in the November general elections

The tables below — 7(a) through 7 (d) — show the votes for governor overall and by party identification. Vote choice is strongly structured by partisanship in these matchups, with 90% or more of Democrats supporting Evers and between 70% and 83% of Republicans supporting the GOP candidate. Independents favor Evers in each of these pairings, although a substantial percentage of independents say they don’t know how they will vote. In these currently hypothetical matchups, Republicans are a bit more likely not to express a vote choice than are Democrats.

Table 7: November general election for governor

(a) Evers vs. Kleefisch

Group

Evers

Kleefisch

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

47

43

1

2

7

Republican

7

80

2

2

9

Independent

39

30

6

8

15

Democrat

90

7

0

0

3

(b) Evers vs. Michels

Group

Evers

Michels

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

48

41

2

1

8

Republican

7

83

1

1

8

Independent

36

18

9

5

28

Democrat

94

3

0

0

3

(c) Evers vs. Nicholson

Group

Evers

Nicholson

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

48

40

1

1

8

Republican

9

80

1

0

9

Independent

30

23

6

11

28

Democrat

93

3

0

0

3

(d) Evers vs. Ramthun

Group

Evers

Ramthun

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

51

34

2

1

11

Republican

13

70

2

1

13

Independent

43

12

8

4

30

Democrat

93

2

0

1

4

Turning to the U.S. Senate race, the next set of tables — 8 (a) through 8 (d) — shows the votes for U.S. Senate, overall and by party identification. In these pairings, Republicans give Johnson 83% to 87% support, while Democrats back their party’s candidates at 86% to 91% rates. Independents vary in support, preferring Barnes by 1 percentage point and Johnson by from 2 to 8 percentage points in the other pairings. As in the race for governor, many more independents are undecided in their vote for U.S. Senate than are Republicans or Democrats.

Table 8: November general election for U.S. Senate

(a) Johnson vs. Barnes

Group

Johnson

Barnes

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

44

46

1

1

7

Republican

86

6

0

0

7

Independent

28

29

11

5

24

Democrat

5

91

0

0

4

(b) Johnson vs. Godlewski

Group

Johnson

Godlewski

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

43

45

2

1

9

Republican

83

7

0

0

8

Independent

30

23

14

4

26

Democrat

5

89

0

0

5

(c) Johnson vs. Lasry

Group

Johnson

Lasry

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

45

42

2

1

10

Republican

87

4

1

0

8

Independent

30

22

12

5

28

Democrat

6

86

1

0

6

(d) Johnson vs. Nelson

Group

Johnson

Nelson

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

Total

43

44

2

1

10

Republican

85

6

1

0

8

Independent

24

22

11

7

34

Democrat

5

89

1

0

5

Enthusiasm to vote

The poll finds that in June there is a significant difference by party in enthusiasm to vote, with 67% of Republicans saying they are very enthusiastic and 58% of Democrats saying the same. Independents are considerably less enthusiastic, with 35% very enthusiastic. In past surveys, enthusiasm was closely linked to being a “likely voter,” as shown also in Table 9.

Table 9: Likely voters (i.e., those saying they are certain to vote), by enthusiasm, 2014-2020

Enthusiastic

Likely Voter

Not Likely

Very

93

7

Somewhat

64

36

Not too

43

55

Not at all

39

60

Enthusiasm has varied by party, with modest Republican advantages in October 2021 and February 2022, but no difference by party in April 2022. Table 10 shows the trend in enthusiasm over the last four Marquette Law School Poll surveys of Wisconsin.

Table 10: Enthusiasm to vote in November, by party identification, October 2021-June 2022

(a) June 2022

Party ID

Very

Somewhat

Not too

Not at all

Republican

67

20

7

6

Independent

35

35

8

20

Democrat

58

26

9

5

(b) April 2022

Party ID

Very

Somewhat

Not too

Not at all

Republican

57

24

9

9

Independent

35

32

15

14

Democrat

57

27

6

8

(c) February 2022

Party ID

Very

Somewhat

Not too

Not at all

Republican

58

22

11

7

Independent

43

30

10

14

Democrat

56

25

12

5

(d) October 2021

Party ID

Very

Somewhat

Not too

Not at all

Republican

63

21

9

6

Independent

43

22

10

23

Democrat

59

25

9

5

This enthusiasm gap is large enough to shift the vote margins significantly in hypothetical November general elections. Table 11 shows the effect of enthusiasm on the margins in the race for governor. By definition, the results for all registered voters reflect a very high turnout, those for both “very” and “somewhat” enthusiastic voters reflect an intermediate turnout, and the results for only those who are “very enthusiastic” reflect a lower turnout.

Table 11: Vote for governor, by potential turnout in November

(a) Evers vs. Kleefisch

Group

Evers

Kleefisch

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

47

43

1

2

7

Intermediate Turnout

47

44

1

1

5

Low Turnout

45

47

1

1

5

(b) Evers vs. Michels

Group

Evers

Michels

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

48

41

2

1

8

Intermediate Turnout

48

43

1

1

6

Low Turnout

46

47

1

1

5

(c) Evers vs. Nicholson

Group

Evers

Nicholson

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

48

40

1

1

8

Intermediate Turnout

47

43

1

0

7

Low Turnout

45

46

0

1

6

(d) Evers vs. Ramthun

Group

Evers

Ramthun

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

51

34

2

1

11

Intermediate Turnout

51

36

1

1

10

Low Turnout

48

40

1

1

9

Table 12 shows the effect of potential turnout on the margins in the race for U.S. Senate.

Table 12: Vote for U.S. Senate, by potential turnout in November

(a) Johnson vs. Barnes

Group

Johnson

Barnes

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

44

46

1

1

7

Intermediate Turnout

46

47

1

0

6

Low Turnout

48

45

1

0

4

(b) Johnson vs. Godlewski

Group

Johnson

Godlewski

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

43

45

2

1

9

Intermediate Turnout

44

46

1

0

7

Low Turnout

47

44

1

1

6

(c) Johnson vs. Lasry

Group

Johnson

Lasry

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

45

42

2

1

10

Intermediate Turnout

45

44

1

0

8

Low Turnout

48

43

1

0

7

(d) Johnson vs. Nelson

Group

Johnson

Nelson

Someone else

Would not vote

Don’t know

High Turnout

43

44

2

1

10

Intermediate Turnout

44

45

1

1

8

Low Turnout

47

44

1

1

6

Enthusiasm is strongly related to age, making for an older electorate in November if the current enthusiasm gap by age remains unchanged. Table 13 shows enthusiasm to vote by age in the June survey.

Table 13: Enthusiasm to vote, by age, June 2022

Age

Very

Somewhat

Not too

Not at all

18-29

27

35

22

17

30-39

43

35

8

14

40-49

58

29

6

7

50-59

70

16

8

4

60-69

79

14

4

1

70+

70

22

4

3

Direction of the state, job approval, and favorability

The percentage saying Wisconsin is headed in the right direction barely changed from April to June. In the new poll, 37% say the state is heading in the right direction and 56% say it is off on the wrong track. In April, 36% said the state was going in the right direction and 56% said it was on the wrong track. The trend in right direction or wrong track is shown in Table 14.

Table 14: Wisconsin headed in right direction or wrong track, 2019-22

Poll dates

Right direction

Wrong track

Don’t know

Refused

1/16-20/19

57

33

10

0

4/3-7/19

52

40

8

0

8/25-29/19

55

37

8

0

10/13-17/19

53

39

7

1

1/8-12/20

46

47

6

1

2/19-23/20

52

39

8

0

3/24-29/20

61

30

9

1

8/3-8/21

39

52

9

0

10/26-31/21

41

51

7

1

2/22-27/22

39

53

8

1

4/19-24/22

36

56

7

0

6/14-20/22

37

56

6

0

Approval of Evers’ handling of his job as governor stands at 48% in June, with disapproval at 45%, little changed from the result of 49% approval to 43% disapproval in April. The full trend for Evers’ approval is shown in Table 15.

Table 15: Evers job approval, 2019-22

Dates

Approve

Disapprove

Don’t know

Refused

Dates

Approve

Disapprove

Don’t know

Refused

1/16-20/19

39

22

38

1

6/14-18/20

54

38

6

1

4/3-7/19

47

37

15

0

8/4-9/20

57

37

6

0

8/25-29/19

54

34

10

1

8/30-9/3/20

51

43

5

2

10/13-17/19

52

34

13

1

9/30-10/4/20

52

42

5

1

11/13-17/19

47

42

10

1

10/21-25/20

50

43

7

0

12/3-8/19

50

38

11

1

8/3-8/21

50

43

7

0

1/8-12/20

51

40

9

0

10/26-31/21

45

46

8

1

2/19-23/20

51

38

10

1

2/22-27/22

50

41

8

1

3/24-29/20

65

29

6

1

4/19-24/22

49

43

7

1

5/3-7/20

59

33

7

1

6/14-20/22

48

45

6

1

In this June poll, President Joe Biden’s approval falls to 40%, with 57% disapproval, his lowest approval rating in the Marquette Law School Poll since taking office. In April 2022, 43% approved and 53% disapproved of Biden’s job performance. Biden’s approval among Wisconsin voters in Marquette Law School Poll surveys during his presidency is shown in Table 16.

Table 16: Biden job approval, 2021-22

Poll dates

Approve

Disapprove

Don’t know

Refused

8/3-8/21

49

46

4

0

10/26-31/21

43

53

4

1

2/22-27/22

43

52

3

2

4/19-24/22

43

53

3

1

6/14-20/22

40

57

3

0

Sen. Johnson’s favorability rating changed little in June, with 37% viewing him favorably, 46% viewing him unfavorably, and 16% saying they haven’t heard enough about him or don’t know how they felt. In April, 36% were favorable, 46% were unfavorable, and 18% lacked an opinion of Johnson. The trend in Johnson’s favorability since 2013 is shown in Table 17.

Table 17: Johnson favorability, 2013-22

Poll dates

Favorable

Unfavorable

Haven’t heard enough

Don’t know

Refused

3/11-13/13

30

25

40

4

0

5/6-9/13

33

25

37

4

0

10/21-24/13

29

33

35

3

0

1/20-23/14

31

25

38

5

0

3/20-23/14

29

27

40

4

0

7/17-20/14

29

29

40

2

0

8/21-24/14

39

25

31

4

1

10/23-26/14

33

30

31

5

1

4/7-10/15

32

29

34

5

0

8/13-16/15

30

31

35

3

0

9/24-28/15

27

36

33

4

0

11/12-15/15

27

38

33

2

0

1/21-24/16

26

33

37

4

1

2/18-21/16

29

33

35

3

0

3/24-28/16

32

31

34

2

0

6/9-12/16

33

31

33

2

0

7/7-10/16

34

35

30

2

0

8/4-7/16

34

32

31

2

0

8/25-28/16

33

34

30

2

1

9/15-18/16

34

36

28

2

0

10/6-9/16

41

33

23

2

0

10/26-31/16

41

38

17

4

0

3/13-16/17

39

34

23

3

1

6/22-25/17

39

32

26

3

0

2/25-3/1/18

40

30

25

4

0

6/13-17/18

39

34

21

5

0

7/11-15/18

40

36

16

7

1

8/15-19/18

40

30

25

4

1

9/12-16/18

38

32

24

6

0

10/3-7/18

41

32

21

5

1

10/24-28/18

39

30

24

6

1

1/16-20/19

44

28

23

5

0

4/3-7/19

40

32

24

5

0

8/25-29/19

40

29

25

6

0

10/13-17/19

40

29

24

6

0

11/13-17/19

39

29

24

7

0

12/3-8/19

36

34

26

4

1

1/8-12/20

39

29

28

3

0

2/19-23/20

37

34

24

5

1

3/24-29/20

35

32

29

4

0

5/3-7/20

38

34

23

5

1

6/14-18/20

35

32

29

3

0

8/4-9/20

33

35

27

4

0

8/30-9/3/20

32

36

28

5

0

9/30-10/4/20

35

31

27

7

0

10/21-25/20

38

36

23

3

1

8/3-8/21

35

42

20

3

0

10/26-31/21

36

42

18

4

0

2/22-27/22

33

45

17

4

1

4/19-24/22

36

46

14

4

0

6/14-20/22

37

46

14

2

0

Concern about issues

Inflation remained the issue voters say they are most concerned about, with 75% saying they are very concerned. In April, 69% were very concerned about inflation.

Fifty-eight percent say they are very concerned about abortion policy, while 56% are very concerned about gun violence. Concern about healthcare is rated somewhat lower, with 47% very concerned, while concern about coronavirus has fallen to its low point of the year, with 18% very concerned. The full set of responses is shown in Table 18.

Table 18: Issue concerns, June 2022

Issue

Very concerned

Somewhat concerned

Not too concerned

Not at all concerned

Inflation

75

20

4

1

Abortion policy

58

24

8

9

Gun violence

56

26

8

9

Healthcare

47

36

12

5

Coronavirus

18

27

23

31

There has been little change among preferences in abortion policy in recent years, with 27% in this survey saying abortion should be legal in all cases and 31% saying it should be legal in most cases. Meanwhile, 11% say it should be illegal in all cases and 24% say it should be illegal in most cases. That represents a small increase in the percent favoring the legality of abortion in all cases and a similar decline in the percent say abortion should be legal in most cases, while the other categories changed little. The full trend on this question is shown in Table 19.

Table 19: Abortion policy preference, 2012-2022

Poll dates

Legal in all cases

Legal in most cases

Illegal in most cases

Illegal in all cases

Don’t know

Refused

9/13-16/12

26

34

23

13

3

1

9/27-30/12

25

35

23

12

3

1

10/11-14/12

25

34

25

12

3

1

10/25-28/12

28

32

23

12

4

1

10/21-24/13

26

36

25

10

2

1

10/23-26/14

24

34

24

15

3

1

7/11-15/18

27

36

18

11

6

2

9/12-16/18

26

36

21

9

6

2

10/24-28/18

26

29

24

14

4

2

2/19-23/20

18

37

22

15

6

3

10/26-31/21

23

38

23

11

4

1

6/14-20/22

27

31

24

11

5

2

Gun policy

Eighty-one percent support “red-flag laws,” which allow police to take guns away from people found by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others, while 13% oppose such laws. Support is unchanged since August 2019, when this question was last asked and 12% were opposed.

Mandatory background checks on people making gun purchases at gun shows or through private sales are supported by 79%, with 16% opposed. In August 2019, 80% supported such background checks and 16% were opposed.

A smaller majority, 56%, support raising the minimum age for gun purchases to 21, while 38% would keep the minimum age at 18. This is the first time this question has been asked in the Marquette Law School Poll.

Transgender issues

A little less than half of the respondents, 44%, say they know someone who identifies as transgender, while 55% do not. This percentage varies strongly by age, as shown in Table 20.

Table 20: Know someone who is transgender, by age

Age

Yes, know someone

No, do not know anyone

Don’t know

18-29

64

36

0

30-44

56

44

0

45-59

41

57

1

60+

31

67

3

Forty-six percent say they favor laws that ban discrimination based on whether a person is transgender, while 39% oppose such laws and 13% say they don’t know.

Participation on sports teams that match an athlete’s current gender identity is supported by 22% of respondents, while 62% say athletes should only be allowed to compete on teams that match their birth gender and 14% don’t know.

Water safety issues

Asked about their level of concern over the safety of the water supply in their community,  20% say they are very concerned, 23% somewhat concerned, 27% not too concerned, and 30% not at all concerned. Concern was higher among residents of the City of Milwaukee, where 33% are very concerned, compared to 18% in all other regions of the state.

Concern about water contamination from the long-lasting chemical PFAS was somewhat higher than concern over the water supply in general. Thirty-one percent are very concerned about PFAS contamination, and 30% are somewhat concerned, while 16% are not too concerned and 18% are not at all concerned over PFAS.

A majority of respondents, 66%, see water quality issues as a statewide concern, while 24% see it as an issue in only isolated parts of the state.

Confidence in the accuracy the 2020 presidential election result

There has been little change in confidence in the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election result in recent months, with 67% saying they are very or somewhat confident that votes were accurately cast and counted in Wisconsin and 32% not too confident or not at all confident. The full trend since August 2021 is shown in Table 21.

Table 21: Confidence in the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin, August 2021-June 2022

Poll dates

Very confident

Somewhat confident

Not too confident

Not at all confident

Don’t know

8/3-8/21

48

19

15

16

1

10/26-31/21

47

18

12

19

3

2/22-27/22

48

19

11

19

2

4/19-24/22

48

16

12

23

1

6/14-20/22

51

16

11

21

0

A majority of Republicans doubt the results, while a majority of independents and Democrats have confidence in the election results. Confidence by party is shown in Table 22. There is some difference in confidence between Republicans and independents who lean to the Republican party.

Table 22: Confidence in the 2020 election by party identification

Party ID

Very confident

Somewhat confident

Not too confident

Not at all confident

Don’t know

Republican

13

21

21

44

0

Lean Republican

19

26

25

28

1

Independent

51

19

3

26

1

Lean Democrat

83

13

1

4

0

Democrat

90

5

3

1

0

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The Marquette Law School Poll is the most extensive statewide polling project in Wisconsin history. This poll interviewed 803 registered Wisconsin voters by landline or cell phone from June 14-20, 2022. The margin of error is +/-4.3 percentage points for the full sample. The margin of error for 369 Democratic primary voters is 6.2 percentage points and for 372 Republican primary voters is 6.3 percentage points.

Some issue items were asked of half the sample. Those on Form A were asked of 401 and have a margin of error of +/-6.2 percentage points. Form B items were asked of 402 and have a margin of error of +/-5.9 percentage points.

Items asked of half-samples include on Form A whether Wisconsin is headed in the right direction or off on the wrong track, concern for inflation, abortion policy, the coronavirus pandemic, gun violence, and healthcare. Form B items included background checks for gun purchases, minimum age to purchase a gun, and red flag laws. Form B also included knowing someone who is transgender, favor or oppose a ban on discrimination against transgender people, and whether transgender athletes should be allowed to compete on teams that match their current gender identity.

The partisan makeup of the sample, including those who lean to a party, is 45% Republican, 44% Democratic, and 10% independent. The partisan makeup of the sample, excluding those who lean to a party, is 30% Republican, 29% Democratic, and 41% independent.

Since January 2020, the long-term partisan balance, including those who lean to a party, in the Marquette Law School Poll has been 45% Republican and 44% Democratic, with 9% independent. Partisanship exuding those who lean has been 29% Republican and 28% Democratic, with 41% independent.

The entire questionnaire, methodology statement, full results and breakdowns by demographic groups are available at law.marquette.edu/poll/results-and-data.


About Kevin Conway

Kevin Conway

Kevin is the associate director for university communication in the Office of University Relations. Contact Kevin at (414) 288-4745 or kevin.m.conway@marquette.edu